P&T News: December 1996
Joan M Murhammer, RPh
Peer Review Status: Internally Peer Reviewed by Gerald H
Clamon, MD and Amy J Becker, PharmD
Hyperosmolar solutions, vasopressor agents, and cytotoxic agents are the cause of the most frequently encountered wounds.6-8 Cytotoxic agents are classified as vesicants, irritants, and non-vesicants according to their potential to cause local toxicity.9, 10 Not all cytotoxic agents have vesicant potential. Non-vesicants do not generally cause a local reaction on administration. Irritants can produce pain, burning, or inflammation without necrosis when extravasated. Vesicants can result in progressive and severe tissue destruction, produce significant pain, and ultimately interfere with the affected extremity's function. Only a small number of these agents are actually responsible for severe tissue necrosis following infiltration. Noncytotoxic agents can also cause local tissue necrosis if infiltrated, but these are not categorized as vesicants, irritants, or non-vesicants. (Table 1).
The process of tissue destruction caused by the leakage of a vesicant into tissue is by nature indolent and progressive.4 The first sign of extravasation is usually pain and burning at the site of infiltration. This may be followed quickly over the next few hours by redness, swelling, and superficial skin loss. The induration may increase and necrosis may begin to develop one to four weeks later. There may be a lack of spontaneous healing and over the course of weeks to months, ulcers may become wider and deeper, sometimes involving underlying structures such as tendons and nerves.
|
Table 1. Irritation and Necrosis Potential of Medications # 1,2,4,9,10,13,15,27 | ||||||
|
|
Cytotoxic Agents |
| ||||
|
Vesicants
|
Irritants
|
Non-Irritants
| ||||
|
Noncytotoxic Agents: | ||||||
| ||||||
|
# The vesicant or irritant properties of additional
medications are not well-established in the literature. | ||||||
The treatment of extravasation injuries includes pharmacologic measures, physiologic measures, and surgery. The infrequent occurrence of vesicant extravasation in clinical practice and restrictions imposed by ethical considerations of studying these adverse reactions in humans contribute substantially to the inadequacy of the currently available information. Studies have demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness for a variety of extravasation treatments in several animal models. Because of anatomical, nutritional, and immunological differences, extrapolation from animals to humans has limitations. Clear measures to counteract tissue damage do not exist for vesicant agents. A variety of surgical and pharmacologic interventions used in treating vesicant extravasations has been anecdotally reported.
Unless complicated by cellulitis or infection, most non-vesicant extravasations result in nothing more than transient swelling, erythema, and mild to moderate temporary pain.2 Application of heat or cold and elevation of the affected extremity are the most common clinical interventions for non-vesicant infiltrations and usually provide adequate relief from symptoms.5 The majority of these infiltrations are recognized early, remain well localized, and heal spontaneously.32 Therapeutic interventions recommended for cytotoxic vesicant extravasation vary, depending on the agent. Unfortunately, prompt recognition and effective management of extravasation injury are hampered by unanswered questions about the nature of vesicant extravasations and lack of scientific data upon which to base treatment approaches.
Risk Factors
The most effective key to the management of extravasations is
prevention. A thorough assessment of both the patient and the venous
access, as well as related risk factors and knowledge of the vesicant
potential of the drug, can do more to decrease morbidity than any of
the purported antidotes.13 Various risk factors may increase the
likelihood of an extravasation injury in some patients7 (Table 2).
Patient-related risk factors-include the inability to communicate,
vascular impairment, and obstructed venous drainage. The type of
intravenous (IV) catheter used is important, as steel needles have
been found to be associated with an extravasation twice as often as
Teflon (plastic) catheters.7 Catheter size is also a factor, a small
gauge catheter to permit ample blood flow around the catheter is
recommended.7 The site chosen for IV injection is an additional risk
factor. The most common sites involved in extravasations are those
where superficial veins are most readily available. These include the
dorsum of hand, forearm, and foot where there is relatively little
soft tissue protection for the underlying tendons and other vital
structures, and where serious consequences can result if an
extravasation occurs.8 Large diameter veins in the midforearm are
preferred for vesicant administration because an inadvertent
extravasation in this area would result in less functional
impairment.2 An infusion pump can increase the risk of extravasation.
High maximum flow pressures are more likely to cause injury.7 When
several cytotoxic agents are to be given, vesicant drugs should be
administered first- because the patient is more aware of symptoms at
the beginning of treatment and because vascular integrity decreases
with sequential administration. The skill of the person performing
the venipuncture and administering the drug may affect the risk of
extravasation. Health care professionals must be proficient at
performing venipuncture, identifying extravasation, and understanding
exactly what measures to follow if it occurs.' Vesicant agents should
be recognized and only given through a newly established line.4, 14 A
vein that is punctured several times before an IV is established
creates a situation that is more likely to lead to drug leakage.26
Continuous monitoring of the IV site during infusions is vital for
early detection of extravasations and interruption of the infusion at
the first sign of discomfort, altered infusion flow, or a local
reaction.15
Table 2. Patient Risk Factors that May Increase the Likelihood of an Extravasation Injury6,7,16
General Treatment Approaches
A variety of interventions has been proposed in treating
extravasations. These measures include thermal manipulation to alter
temperature in the superficial skin, manipulating the pH of exposed
tissue, and injecting antidotes into the affected area to reverse the
action of the infiltrated agent or to otherwise interfere with the
process of cell destruction.2 It is difficult if not impossible to
forecast at an early stage whether the extravasation of a vesicant
will eventually progress to ulceration.9 Only one-third of known
vesicant extravasations will produce ulcers when conservative local
management is used (ice and elevation).11,17 This means that there is
a high likelihood of overestimating the true efficacy of putative
local antidotes since the majority of patients will have a good
outcome following a vesicant extravasation treated with only
conservative therapy.11 Often, antidotes have been discussed in case
reports which, while helpful, do not have rigorous controls needed
for an unequivocal test of efficacy.11
Once the signs of an extravasation are noted, the intervention must be initiated immediately to prevent, or at least minimize, tissue damage. The first step is to stop the infusion.7 Immediate removal of any extravasated fluid using the original indwelling needle/catheter is strongly recommended in managing any vesicant extravasation.3,11,13 While evacuation is usually not possible due to blockage at the needle tip, it can occasionally be useful, with the recovery of substantial amounts of drug. The original needle/catheter can also be left in place to aid in the delivery of a local antidote, thereby eliminating the need for additional injections. Use of the original needle is especially important with mechlorethamine and vinca alkaloid (vinblastine, vinorelbine, vincristine) extravasations where highly effective antidotes are well known, and require close regional delivery if not direct contact with the extravasated drug for maximum efficacy.11
Pressure is always contraindicated, even slight pressure on an extravasated area could spread the vesicant agent over a much broader area. Elevation of the affected extremity is recommended to decrease swelling and increase net blood flow away from the area, thus increasing absorption and distribution of the drug away from the infiltrate site.11 For minor extravasations, elevation may be the only treatment that is necessary.16
The application of either warm or cold compresses to an extravasation site has been debated in the literature. Heat produces vasodilatation, which increases distribution and absorption of the drug from the extravasation site, minimizing the risk of local toxicity.5-7 Moist heat should be avoided because it can lead to maceration and necrosis. Cold promotes localization of the drug in the immediate area of the extravasation through vasoconstriction. Such localization may be desired if an antidote is to be injected into the area. For irritating drugs that require no antidote, initial cold will reduce inflammation and pain.6 Larson used conservative therapy with only limb elevation and intermittent cooling after extravasations in 119 patients.18 Eighty-nine percent of the patients wounds resolved spontaneously without further treatment. In 56 other patients who were initially treated with local antidotes before being referred to plastic surgery, 26 (46%) of the patients required surgery. This study included a variety of cytotoxic agents, including vincristine and mechlorethamine, where well-recognized effective local antidotes are known.
It has been shown that cold will actually increase the toxicity of vinca alkaloid extravasations and should be avoided.4, 7 On the other hand, the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin is significantly reduced by cold and increased by heat.4,7 Cold is preferred for all extravasations by cytotoxic agents, except for vincristine, vinblastine, vinorelbine, and etoposide. Intermittent cold is preferred because continuous application of ice to the area may cause an increase in tissue necrosis. Ice applications are readily available, simple, and nontoxic.4 The conservative approach to extravasations is endorsed by Larson because even proven local antidotes are not consistently effective.18 The application of ice, elevation, and close wound observation can minimize surgery and decrease morbidity.18
Pharmacologic Interventions (See Table 3 for dosage and administration information.)
Sodium Thiosulfate
Sodium thiosulfate, a sulfur nucleophile, is an effective antidote
for mechlorethamine extravasation.9 It acts as an alternative
substrate for alkylation by mechlorethamine to form nontoxic
thioethers which can be excreted into the urine.'5 Mechlorethamine
extravasation can produce severe and prolonged skin ulcers along with
immediate pain and swelling as a result of rapid fixation to all
tissues by alkylation of protein and DNA.5, 10, 15 Vein irritation is
common with mechlorethamine administration and eventually may
progress to a dark bluish-gray hyperpigmentation even in patients
without an extravasation.10 There is a clinical report of an
inadvertent intramuscular injection of 30 mg of mechlorethamine into
a buttock. A 0.17 molar concentration of sodium thiosulfate injected
into the site and an ice pack placed on the injection site for 12
hours provided complete protection of subsequent skin ulceration.23
Rapid use of sodium thiosulfate following mechlorethamine
extravasation is vital for maximal efficacy because of the drug s
rapid local toxic effects; thus, the antidote should be readily
available whenever mechlorethamine is administered.'0'5 Experimental
use of sodium thiosulfate has also been shown to successfully reduce
dacarbazine skin toxicity.9 It is also a possible antidote for
concentrated cisplatin (>0.4 mg/ml) extravasations because it
inactivates cisplatin.9
Hyaluronidase
Hyaluronidase is an enzyme that breaks down hyaluronic acid, a major
component of the normal interstitial barrier of the body s connective
tissue. This breakdown results in enhanced drug distribution and
absorption. Hyaluronidase has been shown to be useful in the
management of the extravasation of commonly used IV fluids and
medications because it reduces or prevents tissue injury by allowing
the rapid diffusion of extravasated fluid. Even though the irritating
material is spread over a large area, tissue reaction is minimized
due to rapid absorption and dilution in tissue fluids.9, 16, 24
Hyaluronidase has been anecdotally reported to be successful in
preventing extravasation-induced tissue injury from 10% dextrose,
parenteral nutrition, calcium and potassium solutions, aminophylline,
radiocontrast media, and natcillin.26, 27 Hyaluronidase has been
shown to significantly increase the skin ulceration from doxorubicin
extravasations and to have no benefit for mitomycin and
mechlorethamine extravasations.11 Hyaluronidase and warm compresses
have been shown to be effective in decreasing the toxicity of vinca
alkaloid extravasations.3,5,11,15 Vinca alkaloids (vincristine,
vinblastine, and vinorelbine) are known vesicants which produce pain
and necrosis following extravasation. They typically produce pain,
erythema, and localized swelling within minutes.11 Skin blisters form
after several days and evolve slowly over weeks to necrotic ulcers.15
Healing may eventually occur even though neurologic sequelae may
remain. Tingling, paresthesias, and sensory deficits at the site may
be permanent.15
Timely administration is a key factor in achieving positive results with hyaluronidase. Treatment should occur immediately (< 1 hour) after infiltration to be most effective.25 Hyaluronidase is remarkably free of side effects and rarely causes allergic reactions (urticaria).24, 26 It should not be injected into acutely inflamed or cancerous areas because there is the potential danger of spreading infection or possibly increasing the invasiveness or metastasis of malignant tumors. Injecting hyaluronidase at a different site from the area of infection does not worsen the infection.8
Phentolamine
Norepinephrine and dopamine are vasopressors that when extravasated
cause circulation to the area to become impaired through their strong
vasoconstrictive action. If not corrected, tissue damage may be
severe enough to cause peripheral ischemia and gangrene,
necessitating skin grafts and occasional extremity amputation.28 The
extravasation site will appear cold, hard, and pale. Phentolamine is
an alpha-adrenergic blocking agent which causes vasodilatation,
thereby decreasing the local vasoconstriction and ischemia, and
subsequently restoring circulation.16 Local administration of
phentolamine may prevent or significantly decrease the degree of
damage from vasopressor extravasations. The effectiveness of
phentolamine can be seen immediately with a dramatic change in local
skin color and temperature.28 It should be administered as soon as
possible or at least within six to twelve hours of the
extravasation.16, 28
Dimethyl Sulfoxide
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a solvent that can penetrate tissues
when applied topically to the skin. It has been evaluated for the
management of extravasations because of its potent free-radical
scavenging properties and possibly its ability to speed up the
removal of extravasated drugs from the tissues.11 The application of
DMSO topically with cooling has been shown effective at reducing skin
ulcerations due to doxorubicin.3, 22 Olver used DMSO topically in 20
patients with doxorubicin extravasations.22 DMSO was applied every
six hours for 14 days and no injuries progressed to ulcers. Patients
experienced mild burning, skin scaling, and an unpleasant garlic
breath odor. Bertilli used DMSO in 75 patients with extravasations of
various cytotoxic agents ( including 44 patients with extravasations
due to mitoxantrone, cisplatin, or ifosfamide, which rarely cause
ulceration).3 DMSO was applied every eight hours for seven days and
ice packs were applied for one hour three times a day for three days.
Only one extravasation (epirubicin) progressed to an ulceration; skin
necrosis was avoided in all other patients. Tolerance and compliance
were good.
Corticosteroids
It has been theorized that the anti-inflammatory effects of
corticosteroids can ameliorate the effects of vesicant
extravasations. Corticosteroids have been advocated in a number of
clinical reports for the treatment of doxorubicin extravasations on
the basis of their purported positive effect on the inflammatory
component of localized injuries.9 Based on this reasoning, they have
been widely used; however, histologic studies have shown that
inflammation is not prominent in the etiology of tissue necrosis.4, 9
Corticosteroids have been shown to be of limited value in the
treatment of doxorubicin extravasations.19 When high doses or
multiple injections of hydrocortisone were given, they significantly
increased doxorubicin and vincristine skin ulcers in experimental
settings.11,14 Corticosteroids inhibit the biosynthesis of collagen;
therefore, caution must be used when employing them to treat
extravasations.4,19 However, if a single injection of low dose (50
mg) hydrocortisone is administered, it should not increase
doxorubicin soft tissue damage.11 Hydrocortisone is no longer
suggested as a local antidote for extravasation in the prescribing
information for doxorubicin (Adriamycin[R]).20
Miscellaneous Pharmacologic Interventions
Sodium bicarbonate has been proposed as an antidote, primarily for
doxorubicin extravasation. Manipulation of local pH by injection of
sodium bicarbonate at the extravasation site has been postulated to
decrease the cellular uptake of doxorubicin and increase its removal
from the area.9 A number of studies in animals have described no
antidotal efficacy with sodium bicarbonate used for doxorubicin
extravasations, and in fact studies in mice have shown that sodium
bicarbonate increases doxorubicin skin toxicity.5, 11, 21 The use of
sodium bicarbonate is discouraged because of the potential for the
drug itself to produce tissue necrosis when extravasated.5, 9
Doxorubicin releases endogenous histamine and catecholamines following administration.11 Antihistamines have not been effective as local antidotes to experimental doxorubicin skin ulcers.11 Isoproterenol was effective in treating rat skin toxicity induced by doxorubicin, but neither isoproterenol nor propranolol was effective in other animal models.11 Because of divergent findings with the beta-adrenergic agents, and the lack of efficacy for antihistamines, there does not appear to be a role for these agents in managing extravasations.11
Surgery
Referral to a plastic surgeon is often necessary when treatment fails
to prevent the progression of an extravasation to ulceration.6 Early
surgical referral for large, painful lesions may dramatically help
mitigate subsequent tissue damage and can help to spare the
involvement of important subcutaneous neural, vascular, and motor
structures. Early intervention is particularly relevant to vesicant
extravasations on the dorsum of the hand.11 However, since as few as
one-third of all vesicant extravasations will ulcerate, the routine
use of excision is obviously not warranted.11 One of the best
clinical indicators for subsequent surgery is reported to be pain at
the extravasation site one to two weeks following the event.17 Once
painful necrosis appears, surgical debridement is indicated. If
debridement is not performed, the necrotic process will almost always
progress.21 For example, doxorubicin has been reported to be trapped
in skin tissues for several months following serious extravasations.
It is hypothesized that active drug is sequentially released from
dying cells and is taken up again by adjacent healthy cells.11
|
Table 3. Literature Supported Extravasation Antidotes/Treatments 9,11,13,15,25-28 | ||
|
Medication |
Antidote/Treatment |
Method of Administration |
|
Mechlorethamine |
0.17 M Sodium thiosulfate |
Dilute 1.6 ml of 25°/. sodium thiosulfate injection with 8.4 ml of sterile water for injection to make a 0.17Msolution. Injeet2 ml into site for each I mg of mechlorethamine or 100 mg of cisplatin extravasated. |
|
Mitomycin-C |
Dimethyl sulfoxide 50% (w/v) |
Apply 1.5 ml to the site every 6 hours for 14 days. Allow to air-dry; do not cover. |
|
Doxorubicin |
Cold compresses and Dimethyl sulfoxide 50% (w/v) |
Apply immediately for 30 to 60 minutes, then alternate off/on every 15 minutes for 1 day. Apply 1.5 ml to the site every 6 hours for 14 days. Allow to air4ry; do not cover. |
|
Vinblastine |
Warm compresses and Hyaluronidase |
Apply immediately for 30 to 60 minutes, then alternate off/on every 15 minutes for 1 day. Inject 150 units (1 ml) into the needle. If needle removed, inject subcutaneously around the site. |
|
Dopamine |
Warm compresses and Phentolamine |
Apply immediately for 30 to 60 minutes, then alternate off/on every 15 minutes for I day. Reconstitute 5 mg with 5 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride to make a I mg/ml solution. Inject 0.5 to I ml of the solution subcutaneously around the site until the entire site is infiltrated (generally to 10 ma) changing the needle between each injection. If the IV access device was left in place, the total dose may be injected directly through the needle. |
|
Dextrose >10% |
Hyaluronidase |
Reconstitute a 150 unit vial with 1 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride. Further dilute 0.1 ml of this solution with 0.9% sodium chloride to a volume of 1 ml resulting in a 15 units/ml final concentration. A 25 gauge needle is used to inject 0.2 ml of solution subcutaneously or intradermally in 4 or 5 separate sites around the extravasation site. If the IV catheter was left in place, 1 ml of the solution should be injected through it. The needle should be changed after each injection. |
|
Medications, other |
Cold Compresses |
Apply immediately for 30 to 60 minutes, then alternate off/on every 15 minutes for 1 day. |
|
* Treatment not typically recommended unless a large amount of highly concentrated solution is extravasated. **No specific treatment guidelines established; anecdotal information supports the use of cold compresses. | ||
Conclusions
There is considerable controversy regarding the most appropriate
management of extravasation injuries. Severe tissue damage is
possible, yet it occurs infrequently. Foremost in the overall
management of extravasation injury is the recognition that prevention
is the most effective way to reduce the incidence of this problem.
Vesicant agents should be given by experienced personnel with careful
patient observation. The patient's cooperation should be solicited,
if possible, so that pain or adverse sensations are immediately
reported. The amount of damage is directly related to the amount of
drug extravasated, so early detection and cessation of the infusion
are paramount to mitigating tissue damage. Consideration should be
made to factors that increase the risk of extravasation so areas of
compromised circulation and areas of underlying tendons and nerves
are avoided.
There are few clear-cut interventions in the case of extravasations. Only a few antidotes have proven effective in decreasing vesicant drug extravasation injury.15 In fact, some interventions may lead to increased ulceration. In cases where there is no evidence to support local antidote treatment, conservative therapy with elevation and cold (unless contraindicated) remain' the best option. When there is a proven antidote available (Table 3), the original IV needle/cannula should be left in place and optimally the antidote should be administered immediately.4 In order to prevent further damage, surgical consultation should be initiated early in cases where pain and induration are unresponsive to conservative management.4 '5 A systematic approach to the treatment of extravasation is recommended, and should include the elements of early detection to halt further drug delivery, conservative treatment, use of proven antidotes, and, when necessary, early surgical excision.'5
References
Pharmacy and Therapeutics Subcommittee Actions
DRUGS ADDED TO STOCK
ADDITIONAL ACTIONS
DRUGS DELETED FROM STOCK